2012
Version 1.0 – 29 April 2011
1 of 11
SBM1201 & 1202 Team QA Work Plan
2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
1.1 1.2 1.3
Introduction
Project Assignments Scope Project Case Study Overview Project Case Study Overview
3
3 3 4
2.
2.1 2.2
Project Governance
Project Team Members Roles and Responsibilities
5
5 5
3.
Communications Plan
3.1 Communications Governance 3.2 Work Breakdown Structure 3.2.1 Roles and responsibilities allocation 3.2.2 Tasks allocation
6
6 6 6 6
4. 5. 6.
Quality Management Plan Risks Management Plan Appendices
6.1 Time management plan 6.2. Template of minutes of meetings.
7 8 9
10 11
Página 2
SBM1201 & 1202 Team QA Work Plan
1. 1.1 Introduction Project Assignments Scope
2012
The project case is to be achieved through the contribution of the learning processes conducted at APIC and applying the knowledge acquired during the workshop. The objected target competencies for Unit SBM 1201 and SBM 1202 Project / Program Fundamental Management are the following: A. Unit SBM1201 ï‚· ï‚· ï‚· Project scope planning, evaluation and change management. Project time planning, scheduling and progress management. Project cost estimating, budgeting and financial management.
B. Unit SBM1202 ï‚· ï‚· ï‚· ï‚· Project/Program Quality Management. Project/Program Risk Management. Project/Program Procurement Management. Integration of
management. Project/Program Quality, Risk and Procurement
1.2
Project Case Study Overview
We assume that our team has been hired as a team of independent professional consultants to assist with the planning and preparation of a Tender (proposal) of the project of NEW IRON COVE BRIDGE, VICTORIA ROAD, SYDNEY.
Página 3
SBM1201 & 1202 Team QA Work Plan
1.3 Project Case Study Overview
2012
The objective of the work plan is to: ï‚· ï‚· Provide a comprehensive plan for the respective assignments of SBM 1201; and 1202 Serve as a live document plan which will be updated accordingly as the assignments progress.
Página 4
SBM1201 & 1202 Team QA Work Plan
2. 2.1 Project Governance Project Team Members
2012
John Citizen (JC), Joe Blogg (JB), Jane Evans (JE) and John Smith (JS) 2.2 Roles and Responsibilities
Each member of the project team will take major responsibility as an acting project coordinator throughout the project regarding to the learning processes. For study purpose only, the roles are subject to rotation. ï‚· Project coordinator (C): ï‚· Coordinate the team, meetings, submissions Coordinate the compliance to assignments checklist and requirements
Project proofreader (PR): Proof read all the documents prior submission with regards to clarifying the writing and ideas of Any reports Proof read any grammar mistakes
ï‚·
Project Quality manager (Q): Assure the documents are spotless from grammar, spelling errors, and uniform and consistence in formatting style prior every submission and assure the document meet the task requirements.
Página 5
SBM1201 & 1202 Team QA Work Plan
3. 3.1 ï‚· ï‚· ï‚· Communications Plan Communications Governance
2012
Communications will take place according to the project timeline. See Appendix 1 Project Gantt chart. Coordinator of the respective activity will take the lead accordingly. Means of communication will be in the form of face to face meeting and the use of online communications tools, such as SKYPE, DROPBOX and EMAIL.
3.2
Work Breakdown Structure 3.2.1 Roles and responsibilities allocation
Assignments / Subjects ROLES SBM 1201 SBM 1202
QA Work plan
Activity 1 Literature review C PR Q
Activity 2 Initiation Plan C PR Q
Activity 3 Detailed Plan C PR Q
Activity 4 Consolidation
C PR
Q
C
PR
Q
3.2.2 Tasks allocation Having on consideration the roles later mentioned and with the initial meeting in each stage the team members will allocate the task in each phase.
Página 6
SBM1201 & 1202 Team QA Work Plan
4. Quality Management Plan
2012
In order to achieve and maintain high level of quality of the assignments deliverables, the following arrangement has been outlined: 1. The team needs to attain to the respective project schedule in a responsible manner. The team shall approach the roles and responsibilities in a professional way and leave no rooms for error as much as they can. 2. Each of the assignment has an appointed coordinator, quality manager and proof reader to ensure the tasks are delivered in accordance with the assignments requirements. 3. Each member must submit confidential group evaluation form. 4. Each member perform individual peer assessment: SLA and MTA for each activities 5. Project literature references use the Harvard Referencing System.
Página 7
SBM1201 & 1202 Team QA Work Plan
5. ï‚· ï‚· ï‚· ï‚· ï‚· ï‚· ï‚· Risks Management Plan
2012
Potential risks identified during the development of the assignments: Restricted information access Time schedule limitation Lack of commitment of the team members
Risks mitigation plan: Assumption will be applied in lieu of the unattainable data Good communication plan and coordination Good control and update of the work plan Exercise individual evaluation form and peer assessments for each activity
Página 8
SBM1201 & 1202 Team QA Work Plan
2012
6. ï‚· ï‚·
Appendices
Appendix 1 Time management plan – Gantt chart Appendix 2 Template of minutes of meetings
Página 9
SBM1201 & 1202 Team QA Work Plan
6.1 Time management plan
2012
Página 10
SBM1201 & 1202 Team QA Work Plan 6.2. Template of minutes of meetings. Minutes of Meetings XXXXXXXXX – 1201 & 1202 Attendees: Apologices:, Date: XXXXXXXXXXXX Thought XXXXXXXXXXX Agenda: Tasks 1. Check assistance. 2. Check Timeframe. Who When
2012
Status Done
3. Agree the place and time to the next meeting.
